Jun 14th, 2007
Supreme Court Fires Uba, Former Obasanjo’s Assistant and Anambra State’s Newly Elected Governor
Peter Obi is Anambra gov – Supreme Court rules – Nullifies Andy Uba’s election – Yar’Adua orders Uba to quit office immediately
THE Supreme Court on Thursday returned Peter Obi as the authentic governor of Anambra State, voiding the swearing-in of Chief Andy Uba as the governor of the state. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous judgment, faulted the conduct of election into the office of governor of Anambra State on April 14, while the tenure of Mr. Obi was yet to expire and, therefore, ordered that Obi should return to his seat immediately. President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, in reaction to the judgment, ordered Chief Uba to vacate the office with immediate effect.
Terminating Chief Uba’s administration, thereby making him the shortest serving governor having spent only 16 days in office after he was sworn in on May 29, 2007, Justice Aloysius Katsina-Alu, who delivered the lead judgment, held that Section 180 (2) (a) upon which Obi anchored his case provides that he shall vacate office at the expiration of a period of four years commencing from when he took the oath of office and allegiance.
Obi was sworn in as the governor of Anambra State on March 27, 2006 after Dr. Chris Ngige was removed from office as the governor of the state. The Court of Appeal in Awka voided the election of Ngige and declared Obi the winner of the April 19, 2003 election contrary to the claim of the Independent National Electoral Commission.
A day before Uba was sworn-in as the governor, the apex court warned that if anybody is sworn in as governor and they later found out that Obi’s tenure had not been expended, the person sworn in shall quit office.
Justice George Oguntade, who made the declaration on May 28, 2007, said, “The swearing-in of anybody tomorrow does not extinguish the res of this matter. If anybody is sworn in and we found out that the incumbent’s tenure of office has not been expended, the person sworn-in has to quit office, and the election (governorship) in the state would be voided”.
Justice Katsina-Alu agreed with the arguments canvassed by Obi that his four-year tenure would expire on March 27, 2010 having been sworn in as governor on March 27, 2006. Section 180 (2) (a) in question reads, “Subject to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, the governor shall vacate his office at the expiration of a period of four years commencing from the date when:
(a) In the case of a person first elected as governor under this constitution, he took the oath of allegiance and oath of office.” The apex court held that the court below was wrong in holding that Obi’s case was an election matter to be adjudicated upon by the election tribunal.
Thereafter, the court invoked its powers under section 22 of the acts to pronounce on the merit of the case. Justice Katsina-Alu said the Supreme Court or any other court had a duty to protect the constitution as doing otherwise would spell doom for the country and the nation’s democracy. He, accordingly, made the following orders;
Other justices on the seven-man panel agreed with the lead judgment and the consequential orders.
In his judgment, Justice Oguntade held that the two lower courts were in error to have declined jurisdiction to hear the case, leading them into an erroneous conclusion that the matter fell under the jurisdiction of the election tribunal.
Continue Reading »